10/15/2009
The Internet- Flawed?
I'm going to start by pointing out what I found the most relevant in his speech.
First of all: connectivity. The ability to communicate faster is remarkable- except when people use it in a negative way. If people communicate wrong information and change the core of a certain truth, it is not being used in a good way.
So if people can communicate wrong ideas about anything, then no one is safe. Anyone can be targeted.
This is how the Rwanda genocide happened. Because so much hatred was targeted towards Rwanda. Over 800,000 Rwandans were killed in 100 days.
Now, cyberbullying might not affect such a big amount of people so fast, but it is a problem caused by technology. One can target a person and emotionally hurt them which would damage their self esteem. Who knows the consequences this can have?
Also, teenagers do not realize that because of facebook, people can follow us. If a teenager applies to a job, the managers can find us and see if we are ''appropriate'' for the job. Meaning that, even if one looks proper and polite, but have pictures of himself showing a complete other personality, his proper looks is become irrelevant.
During all of Eugene's speech, I was waiting for a point he did not even mention. I feel like because of technology, my generation is now way more antisocial. We are so hooked to our computers that we have lost almost all social skills. In my parents generation, if they wanted to speak to someone, they needed to call them- if not see them. For my generation, we can simply stay in our house, from the back of our computer, and see if they're online. Most of the time, if they aren't we'll just find someone else to speak too.
Even though Internet is not flawless, I do believe that it does more good than bad. We can communicate faster, find better and newer information, learn what's going on around the world through the simple use of TWITTER ! Internet is almost a miracle.
10/08/2009
Information Is Power
As he explained, when the generations of ''baby boomers'' were our age, they spent more time watching television. In their times, everything took way more time then it does today. They didn't use as much technology on regular basis. For me, it's almost not a choice, but a necessity. Most of the information needed for school can be found through the internet. Instead of having to look for hours in books, we can use our internet browser. We can now find newspapers and even all tv shows on the internet. The amount of hours possibly spent on the internet obviously increased. This made us ''faster''. We can multi-task easierly than our parents, and we can do everything in a shorter amount of time. Don gave the metaphor of a running track. The older generations would be placed on the outside track, and my generation are not only on the inside track, but we are running way faster then the older generations. But is that necessarily bad? We like seeing things move faster, and see a certain growth. Everyone sees this as a bad thing..(!)
As we outrun them so easily, even some ''outside runners'' tried to catch up and understand our way of living. It was almost impossible for many. Eventhough one would try to fully understand our way of living with technology, it is a difficult task, since they have to catch up to a lifetime full of learning. Another thing Don said was that ''we fear what we don't understand''. As more individuals from older generations failed to understand the newest technologies, most of them closed their mind to it. In fear of having to admit they did not have the potential to understand our daily routine, they have created assumptions based on what the image that my generation projects. Which explains the ''lazy'' and ''less aware''. I guess they didn't understand that we can do everything they can form the use of a simple computer.
What I found very true that parents still fail to see, is that we have, like Don said, a ''Bs detector''. The internet has so much of it that my generation has learned how to filter it and to pick up the truth. This ''detector'' can be applied everywhere. When my generation sees something, we're going to wonder is thats the truth, and how it was modified. He took the example of his daughter and him looking at the same picture on a magazine. If its a woman, Tapscott will think about his opinion on how she looks (woman on the magazine cover), but his daughter will wonder how she has been photoshoped==> Bs Detector!
